![]() ![]() Duplicate said rectangle (select item, Ctrl+D).Ģ. What you *could* try is the following (essentially what druban suggested):ġ. If you are thinking of having a third "handle" that would be entirely independent of the other two, of course this would be quite different, not an ellipse, certainly not a quadratic (2nd degree), and something to give the SVG developers a bit of a nightmare. You could describe the ellipse by establishing another angle (other than 90) for the second arm, but it would still be an ellipse, just with a needlessly more complicated calculation. ![]() The reason for having two arms is to describe the shape of the ellipse, in other words, the length of the short arm specifies the minor axis, the other arm the major axis. in effect, you only have one set of nodes that describe colour, although they are, for convenience, duplicated on each arm. the same gradient nodes are on each axis of the radial gradients. ![]() Brynn wrote:What would happen if we could take a radial gradient, and move one of the handles to some angle besides 90 degrees to the other? That would be Awesome!Īlthough it sounds like it might be something other than what we have now, in fact it would be no different. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |